"Amoral" means neither moral nor immoral. That's exactly how I would describe a transactional relationship, so yes, I'll stick with that word.
> Most companies have slack and generally avoid doing layoffs unless there's a special situation.
You're just making arbitrary claims here - the fact that companies can and do lay people off without notice and, sometimes, without severance, still confirms the nature of what I'm saying. It's all feel good until it isn't.
> why on earth would anyone think it's anything else?
I don't know; ask the others in this thread. There are plenty of people here claiming that they owe their company things (time, emotional investment) that go beyond the scope of their employment contract simply because it's "nice."
> once people are employed, they're not doing to drop them instantly.
This is simply not the case. Or, rather, it can be the case so easily and at any time that it's foolish to assume otherwise.
> Most companies have slack and generally avoid doing layoffs unless there's a special situation.
You're just making arbitrary claims here - the fact that companies can and do lay people off without notice and, sometimes, without severance, still confirms the nature of what I'm saying. It's all feel good until it isn't.
> why on earth would anyone think it's anything else?
I don't know; ask the others in this thread. There are plenty of people here claiming that they owe their company things (time, emotional investment) that go beyond the scope of their employment contract simply because it's "nice."
> once people are employed, they're not doing to drop them instantly.
This is simply not the case. Or, rather, it can be the case so easily and at any time that it's foolish to assume otherwise.