Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1. That article isn't peer reviewd.

2. You linked to an old version that says "However, in July, the effectiveness against infection was considerably lower", in the current version the same sentence reads "In July, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization has remained high"



You say it "isn't peer reviewed". I say it's a "preprint paper".

That's generally how the media describes the papers that respectively go against, or with the narrative they're trying to push.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: