That's amusing. The change must've occurred in the ~8 minute window between the submission and my comment, which seems odd considering the article is 2 days old. Not casting doubt, but remarking on coincidence.

Most likely the fact that it appeared here caused someone to look at it, realize that the title didn't match the contents, and hurry to change it.

The old title really was egregiously bad. @dang, can we get it fixed?

A/B test caught in action possibly?