Jobs that must be on-site (medical, manufacturing, etc.).
Going fully remote results in:
- Profit on real estate
- No/less expenses on utilities
- No expenses on relocation packages
- No expenses on custodial staff
- No/reduced expenses on office furniture
I mean, from a cost perspective, fully remote is clearly a big boon for a company. Either Microsoft is truly seeing reduced worker productivity from WFH, or there is another incentive, but it's not strictly economic.
Going fully remote results in:
- Profit on real estate - No/less expenses on utilities - No expenses on relocation packages - No expenses on custodial staff - No/reduced expenses on office furniture
I mean, from a cost perspective, fully remote is clearly a big boon for a company. Either Microsoft is truly seeing reduced worker productivity from WFH, or there is another incentive, but it's not strictly economic.