Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"smoking indoors is illegal because smoking is less 'socially acceptable'"

No - this is false.

It's illegal because it's harmful to others - and - it's generally a nuisance i.e. it really smells quite a lot.

Chewing tobacco is completely legal 'indoors' and it has many of the same negative effects. It's not even up for consideration in terms of banning. You can chew it on the Subway, at the Office.

"Perhaps I'm missing something important here?"

Yes, you're missing the fact that we already do heavy suppression of Meth/Heroin i.e. teaching kids how terrible it is, featuring it in films as extremely negative, positioning it as 'totally socially taboo and unacceptable behaviour'.

Selling it in stores legally is both an increase in availability, and a significant reduction in social taboo.

This is not even an argument.

Widespread availability and lessening of social taboos of an extremely addictive substance, which addicts develop a tolerance for and quickly move onto more powerful substances (Fentanyl) would yield a major public health crisis. We already have on on our hands.

70 000 dead from OD in the USA in 2019 - and rising 32 000 car accident deaths in the USA 2019 - and going down

It's growing quite a lot in the Midwest.

[1] https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/deaths/2013-2017-increase.h...




>"smoking indoors is illegal because smoking is less 'socially acceptable'"

>No - this is false.

>It's illegal because it's harmful to others - and - it's generally a nuisance i.e. it really smells quite a lot.

And it was less harmful or a nuisance before it became illegal? And it smelled less too? Please.

Smoking indoors was banned because of the effort to make it less socially acceptable.

If it were otherwise, those bans would have been in place 40 years ago. We knew it was harmful in the 1960s (actually, even before that, but various societies didn't start trying to make it less socially acceptable until the 1970s).

It wasn't until the 1990s/2000s when such bans went into effect. Why? Because smoking had become less socially acceptable -- through conscious efforts[0][1] over decades to make it so.

>Chewing tobacco is completely legal 'indoors' and it has many of the same negative effects. It's not even up for consideration in terms of banning. You can chew it on the Subway, at the Office.

So what? I was (and explicitly said so) talking about smoking, not chew.

You are apparently ignorant of history. Which makes it hard to have a conversation that, for obvious reasons, needs to take that history into account. So let's not.

[0] https://truthinitiative.org/research-resources/tobacco-indus...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_nicotine_marketi...


>Yes, you're missing the fact that we already do heavy suppression of Meth/Heroin i.e. teaching kids how terrible it is, featuring it in films as extremely negative, positioning it as 'totally socially taboo and unacceptable behaviour'.

>Selling it in stores legally is both an increase in availability, and a significant reduction in social taboo.

Who, exactly are you responding to here? Because it isn't me.

I never even implied that such drugs should be fully legalized/commercialized.

Go and build, then knock down your straw man somewhere else. I'm not interested.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: