One might note that I took the least extreme position possible: that gender neutral language is harmless; but gender specific language may offend so it makes sens to use the neutral form.
One may also note that there are much more extreme positions available: that the author's language choices displays an underlying current of sexism that is found though out the IT, business and web communities. I didn't say that because I don't think it is true - but perhaps I should have because I'd have started a discussion instead of just getting a downvote.
One might also note that someone could disagree with me and reply, instead of a lazy downvote.
One might note that I took the least extreme position possible: that gender neutral language is harmless; but gender specific language may offend so it makes sens to use the neutral form.
One may also note that there are much more extreme positions available: that the author's language choices displays an underlying current of sexism that is found though out the IT, business and web communities. I didn't say that because I don't think it is true - but perhaps I should have because I'd have started a discussion instead of just getting a downvote.
One might also note that someone could disagree with me and reply, instead of a lazy downvote.