Funny how everyone was mocking that judge for thinking that zooming might add data, yet here is an example showing that zooming reduces the age of someone's face and removes the aggression from a tiger's expression.

You might say "well of course we all know that this AI based super-resolution uses too much computing power to do in real time on an iPad, where they can only do sinc interpolation" but how long will that be true for? It's not really unreasonable for a judge not to know about technical details like that.

I was pretty shocked at how all of the comments on the Ars article about it were so misguided.