Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Solar and wind need very expensive storage to be reliable. I would say these technologies and nuclear complement each other.


Solar and wind do need storage, but if their levelized cost of energy is low enough they still beat nuclear. Remember not to use batteries for annual load leveling, which some dishonest analysts try to do.


What are the main alternatives? Pumping water is probably the biggest?


For seasonal storage and rare event backup: hydrogen burned in a combined cycle plant. Hydrogen can be stored underground for maybe $1/kWh of storage capacity.


High voltage dc interconnects? Importing Danish wind energy is one of the projects supposed to keep the lights on after an exit from nuclear in Belgium.


Yeah... I'm not too sure about those Danish winds blowing when the Belgian ones aren't. This last week would have been a major issue for example.


I believe that hydro for storage is pretty much maxed out already.


On-river hydro storage is maxed out, but the potential for off-river pumped hydro is vast.

http://re100.eng.anu.edu.au/global/




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: