Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Here is another weird SB9 restriction: No AirBNB's. Homes created by SB9 can be sold or rented. However, if rented, the minimum rental is 31 days.

Why? Why should the state of CA slip in something like this if the lot is split as two APNs?



There may be a grey market opportunity here. Rent your property to a company you control which exists solely for the purposes of exploring business opportunities with people you know from Airbnb, and as you are friends, you might allow them to crash at your place anytime they need or want in exchange for a modest sum.


If you really believe that this is a market, what do you think the valuation of said market opportunity would be..


I don’t know, but I’d speak with a friendly real estate agent and my lawyer before advising this. This is not legal or real estate advice. I am not a lawyer or real estate agent.

What do you think the market opportunity is?

Do you have any ideas about how to improve housing accessibility in HCoL areas, or ideas for how to improve tax bases and social services for current and future residents? I can tell from your posts in this thread that this issue is important to you, and I hope we can discuss alternatives and improvements to the status quo.

What about these issues do you think should stay the way it is?


> What do you think the market opportunity is?

I didn’t say there was one. You did. I will wait.


> I didn’t say there was one. You did. I will wait.

I said there may be one, but that’s neither here nor there.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: