Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>Apple would fight this all the way to the Supreme Court. This is IMHO a clear violation of the 1st amendment.

I'm not so sure anymore. Apple of yore is dead. They recently announced a plan to scan local files on iPhones against a government created list of hashes. Only after immense backlash did they agree to "delay" the implementation. This had no profit motive for Apple. As a company, the move served to seriously undermine decades worth of security good will. One can only surmise that they did so in preparation for upcoming legislation like this to ensure their compliance, and continued access to said markets. Apple doesn't care about fighting moral wars. They only care about market access and continued profits. If that means removing apps and scanning phones, I think they'll do it without much fuss.



They recently announced a plan to scan local files on iPhones against a government created list of hashes.

This is incorrect. Only images uploaded to iCloud would be checked if they matched against multiple CSAM databases.

From the beginning, disabling iCloud Photos disabled this feature.

They painstakingly described the algorithms and encryption behind the plan.

I will remind you that Apple could had given in to the FBI’s request to create a back door to the San Bernardino shooter’s iPhone a few years ago and Apple very publicly told them to pound sand.

Ironically Apple is now suing the company the FBI used to crack that iPhone: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2021/11/apple-sues-nso-group-...


To play devil's advocate, I actually suspect the reason Apple were planning to implement this was because they were intending to start using E2E encryption on iCloud photos, but to keep various governments off their back figured they could placate them by implementing this scanning.


If so, what a monumental PR disaster to not lead with that instead.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: