I'm not playing fucking semantic games. I'm telling you your sentence is straight up wrong. I already get what you mean. We can end it here. But your usage of the term marriage HEAVILY implies causation and that's what I thought your meaning was when I read your language.

Obviously you meant different. BUT my technical guideline will help you prevent future misunderstandings. If your logic and technical language is bulletproof then your entire argument will be as well.

>Sure, you can backtrack and it becomes a population observation rather than a racist rant about what white women will ONLY choose.

What's wrong with backtracking? I don't understand. You use imprecise language and you backtrack and I can't? All the fuck we're doing here is trying to communicate and clarify communication. When I attempt to clarify you accuse me of backtracking and try to paint me as a racist?

It is 100% true that as a generality white women are not interested in asian men due to status. Even Asian women in the US aren't as interested in Asian men as a result of the same perception. This is a VERY real phenomenon. It is not racist to describe reality.

Do you know who I am? I'm asian. I grew up facing some of the most racist white people in existence. Do not call me a racist, not after what the white race did to my people and others. Let me be absolutely clear. I am not racist. Neither are you, but if you choose to call me a racist EVEN though I clearly am not then you are no worse then them.

"Are you white? Why are you backtracking on all the people your race enslaved and killed?" It would be wrong if I used the previous sentence on you. I'm not. Just throwing it in here as an example to show you how ludicrous your backtracking bs is.