ZZ is the same as :x which are both what I would normally want to do - only write if changed.
I would use :wq! to overwrite readonly files more than I would use :wq The only use case I can think of writing when not changed is if there is a process watching the file that I want to trigger.
I think the problem with teaching people how to save and quit in vim is that there are so many ways they might want to do it and nobody wants to dumb it down to a single default. It is a bit like how Zig doesn't have a simple print macro because in real code do you want your output buffered or unbuffered, etc.
I would use :wq! to overwrite readonly files more than I would use :wq The only use case I can think of writing when not changed is if there is a process watching the file that I want to trigger.
I think the problem with teaching people how to save and quit in vim is that there are so many ways they might want to do it and nobody wants to dumb it down to a single default. It is a bit like how Zig doesn't have a simple print macro because in real code do you want your output buffered or unbuffered, etc.