Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I'm not sure how we can hope to stop that inertia short of being limited by cheap energy or running out of actual land.

Having the residents of the suburbs paying for their true cost seems like a great way to start: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Nw6qyyrTeI

As the video points out, would people be willing to start paying $9000 in property taxes instead of $1800 to stop operating the city at a loss every year?



> Having the residents of the suburbs paying for their true cost seems like a great way to start

I completely agree. I think the point I was trying to convey is that it's not just financial inertia going on here - it's probably the single most cohesive and politically active power bloc there is in the country.


I live in a small ~100k city that is a mix of commercial, light industry, and residential. (both apartments and typical suburban-style). We don't operate at a loss, but I do pay > $10k in property taxes. So, people are willing to pay these prices, the model is not unsustainable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: