Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> we should generally be at, or near, the performance of Alacritty

> evidence that it’s not

> Yeah, this is a known issue

I don’t want to be critical, but which is it? If you know you are not anywhere near the performance, why say you are?



> If you know you are not anywhere near the performance, why say you are?

(in a voice like Jon Lovitz as Master Thespian) Marketing!


Hey - that's a good point. The thing about terminal benchmarks is that there are many of them, each focusing on a different aspect and producing different results. There's one by alacritty team[1] that we used in our initial tests[2], there's another ones mentioned in the comments above etc. When using vtbench, Warp performed much better than iterm, for example.

Ideally we'd ace all of them, but we're not there yet. Anecdotally, many of our users mention speed/performance improvements over other terminal apps a lot in our Discord!

[1] https://github.com/alacritty/vtebench [2] https://www.warp.dev/blog/how-warp-works


I don’t see the contradiction. They should be, but they aren’t.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: