> Warp is a blazingly fast, rust-based terminal reimagined from the ground up to work like a modern app.
Well, at least they didn't lie.
As of my personal position: I want less products in my computing environments, not more. I hope more people would ponder on possible ramifications of going in the opposite direction.
I'm not sure I care very much about which piece of software is a "product" or not (I have no qualms with devs asking for money), but I definitely agree that calling a piece of software "modern" actually carries negative connotations nowadays. I think most would agree that apps developed within the last 4 years are often more resource-intensive and slower than the equivalents from 15+ years ago.
Warp looks really cool as a tool and I intend to try it as soon as it's available on Linux, but it was pretty bold of them to include outgoing network requests by default before presenting directly to HN. I saw the post about "everything is opt in, where 'everything' means 'sending terminal contents'" - as if people read privacy policies before trying out a new dev tool.
We exists, but it's complicated. A complete solution has more edge cases than what "stacks" have tools to work with. My gut feeling is that the contemporary approach to solving information problems is crazy nonsense. I'm working on something to prove myself wrong. If I'm not I'll make something available for a fee
Well, at least they didn't lie.
As of my personal position: I want less products in my computing environments, not more. I hope more people would ponder on possible ramifications of going in the opposite direction.