The conditional implies it's not happened yet I take it. Would people just go on the internet and write authoritatively about things they don't know and haven't even looked up?
It's by the way those who make a claim (or wish to support it) that have to provide the evidence, not the other way around. It is unlikely you'll find anyone on HN inexperienced enough in formal logic to attempt to disprove a flying teapot. So you go ahead and provide the data and demonstrate how the carbon can't come to the surface in thousands of years, which was the original claim and which so far remains completely unsubstantiated.
The conditional implies it's not happened yet I take it. Would people just go on the internet and write authoritatively about things they don't know and haven't even looked up?
It's by the way those who make a claim (or wish to support it) that have to provide the evidence, not the other way around. It is unlikely you'll find anyone on HN inexperienced enough in formal logic to attempt to disprove a flying teapot. So you go ahead and provide the data and demonstrate how the carbon can't come to the surface in thousands of years, which was the original claim and which so far remains completely unsubstantiated.