I feel like this contrasts with what I thought your position was based on your previous posts. As far as this particular post goes, I'm not sure I really disagree with you lol
From your previous posts, I thought you were not okay at all with private companies regulating speech on their platforms.
My initial position was that censorship has historically been mostly bad. My more fully explained position is that censorship is bad enough that we should not let the state censor, but not bad (or good) enough that the state should interfere in the publication of speech by private media platforms.
I guess this is why the best opinion-havers write essays instead of hot takes in the comment section.
From your previous posts, I thought you were not okay at all with private companies regulating speech on their platforms.