I have to wonder: isn't this how democratizing information goes in general? In my lifetime I think we did it yet again with the Internet and especially social media. On the good side, people who care enough can check and study the source for just about anything; on the bad side, we see that most people don't care enough and are perfectly OK with consuming lies and manipulation. Then came people who were also perfectly OK with producing any kind of lie and manipulation to get what they wanted. And they largely did get what they wanted, up to and including presidential elections. We now have both: more educated, curious, and well-informed people than ever and more manipulative, toxic charlatans with huge followings than ever. It would be great if we could have the former without the latter, but would that be possible, even in theory? I'm not sure...
Ex: https://trendguardian.medium.com/free-will-a-rich-fairy-tale...
A lot of Christian popular ideas are unfortunately stemmed from "money worship"
The good thing about the reformation is that it democratized information - everyone can check and study the source
The bad thing is that everyone can interpret and create their own "truth" with lies and manipulation.
Unfortunately, there is no peer reviewed process as with the scientific method