Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Agreed, but I see the impulse to standardize as the source of a lot of the problems people have — by people, I mean both good engineers, and the companies who can't hire them.


Honest question, how would you handle hiring at FAANG scale without standard processes?

For reference we had an opening in my team and 1600 people applied.


This process still relied on screening, including technical screens. The biggest difference is that it substituted a day of whiteboard interviews with a day of pairing, which we found to produce better results, and candidates really liked too.


Apple used to have a per team interview process(don’t know if it has changed). While the interview experience can vary a lot, there are certain pockets/teams that are spectacularly brilliant and have the freedom to maintain the bar & conduct targeted hiring.


Having 1600 applicants for a SE role is not a unique, but definitely a very niche, problem to have...


go on linkedin and message the people you think can do the job based on prior work and experience or degrees. trash the rest.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: