Interesting; it has anti-circumvention provisions. These provisions would appear (to my not-legally-trained reading; this is not legal advice) to apply to software such as BIND. After all, anyone can run their own instance of BIND, and thereby "resolve to that domain name’s Internet protocol address notwithstanding the measures taken by a service provider under paragraph (2) to prevent such reso lution".

This seems like a bad consequence, what with BIND and its equivalents being absolutely vital pieces of Internet infrastructure software.