> (B) had 200 unique visitors a month and a stack built on Kubernetes with > something like 8 microservices. It was running Apollo, Socket.io, and on and on; > literally overcomplicating everything...for 200 unique visitors a month. Every > single aspect of that system was over-complicated. CTO was part of the problem, > but was complicit in letting tech team go wild; many of whom just up and left > after playing around with the tech.

I do not understand how can anyone draw any conclusions from this whether or not the technology were at fault here for the implied failure.