Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well said! I don't think I found a argument in that article that I would agree with. The mentioning of Perl as a great example is probably the worst. The purpose of a programming language is to express things as precisely as possible, both to a computer and to a human. Perl's extreme context-sensitivity is what I dislike most about it.

Regarding Unicode support, I see it having some advantages, but current editors don't support Unicode input well. Emacs has an input mode where you can type \alpha and it replaces it with the appropriate unicode character, but I haven't seen any other editors with support for that. For some more obscure symbols, it can also be difficult to find out how to input them.

I'm wondering whether that article is actually meant seriously -- some of these claims are just so absurd.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: