The thing that kept Linux off the desktop all these years has been a consistent, backwards compatible ABI and user interface. Under the proposed scenario, MS will be the one providing these missing elements.
Which is the dog and which is the tail? And does anyone really care?
The thing that kept Linux off the desktop all these years has been a consistent, backwards compatible ABI and user interface. Under the proposed scenario, MS will be the one providing these missing elements.
Which is the dog and which is the tail? And does anyone really care?