Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Depending on one's definition of "good," running GL locally in docker is (in my experience) painless, given sufficient disk space and probably RAM

But yes, your observation is my whole complaint: it is not _reasonable_ to ask a GLCI developer to run a local copy of GL, complete with any shared GLCI template repos, in a local docker container just to have local execution. Maybe I wouldn't complain about it so much had I not started with circleci so long ago and had such a "wow, this is amazing" followed by gitlab-runner's :troll_face: -- to say nothing of GitHub Actions just straight up ignoring that whole demographic and hoping https://github.com/nektos/act emulates enough to have people not notice the massive feature gap



unfortunately `act` is pretty bad :(

My go to workflow for workflows (ha) is forking a repo as a private fork and toying on it until I'm happy with the results




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: