Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yep, that's the typical straw-man from K8S zealots: compare static, even bare-metal setups with theK8S API "revolution", forgetting that the "clouds" (both public and private) already had APIs that covered most of it. Sure, there are some nice additions on top of that like "operators" that take advantage of the main loop you have already perpetually running in a k8s cluster, but the leap is not that astronomical as some says.


If you think those APIs don't need tons of scripts to be useful to a company, then either you do everything through the AWS console, or you are an anti-k8s zealot yourself.


There are many established solutions on top of those APIs, that let you manage them with code, DSLs, graphical UIs etc. (i.e. Terraform, Harness, Pulumi, Spinnaker etc)


In fact I am not arguing against TF, which I love. I don't know how that came up here, k8s is at a different level in the stack.


It came up here because with Terraform you can automate many parts of the cloud (VMs) provisioning and deployment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: