Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

if nothing else, most landlords have loans so you're subsidising their loan (so paying at least as much as you would if you had the loan).


Perhaps, not certainly, but is that a drawback?

A mortgage is essentially a huge long-term bet, renting is a smaller, shorter term bet. The owner is betting that everything lines up nicely: the value of his property stays put or rises, nothing bad unexpectedly happens to the property, undesirable people don't move in around it, a whole-sector bubble doesn't pop. As a renter, there is no commitment: if the house is outdated you can move to a newer one with far less hassle; you don't have to worry about cost of maintenance; if you move during a bubble you can move once again when the bubble pops and pay less. The owner may end up with a property in 20 years if everything goes well, but a renter will never be underwater.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: