Wouldn’t we need to see it done, at a company that has found product market fit, before we can decide that it is clearly “the gold plated standard for a 21st (century) business”?
As a recent publicly traded company, I would read their annual report[1] as Gitlab describes their product fit well, even stating their product "is available to any company, regardless of the size, scope, and complexity" and their CEO saying in their earnings release[1] they "are seeing continued strong momentum for customers adopting our DevOps platform, as revenue increased 69% year-over-year"
They are fast follow / undercutting by bundling ideas innovated by GitHub and CI/CD etc co's and boost marketing via OSS. Fuel rapid sprawling dev by offshoring and VC. It's a financial innovation, not tech. New tech may appear as a side-effect of ^^^^.
It's pretty darn cynical bc market fit is pre-established. Must be frustrating for folks coming from the technical innovation side of their market.
Yep, never said it was illegal! Purely a response to a comment questioning the business side, when it is a pretty by-the-numbers play. GitHub was slow on enterprise and bundling, so left room for a 'bottom feeder' to bundle & grow if they could solve the cheap dev side
However, its "open source internal practices" model is the gold plated standard for a 21st Business.
If you're any kind of manager of anything, do this.
See: http://blog.idonethis.com/managers-write/ for more.