“Gun” here is a metaphor for capital, which is the instrument of might and right. In capitalism, individuals rarely need guns, because the system has in place necessary measures for what an individual could achieve by resorting to a gun.
> I might argue that the more likely scenario in a socialist society (i.e. anti-private property) is that a man who paid for three seat tickets would be forced at gunpoint to hand those seats over to people who didn't buy any tickets.
Why would a society that has allowed freedom to purchase three tickets would allow others to violate that freedom? Anarchism is not disorder.
> I might argue that the more likely scenario in a socialist society (i.e. anti-private property) is that a man who paid for three seat tickets would be forced at gunpoint to hand those seats over to people who didn't buy any tickets.
Why would a society that has allowed freedom to purchase three tickets would allow others to violate that freedom? Anarchism is not disorder.