Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Given the time, effort and hard dollar expense they put into development of BedrockDB - I have to imagine they do more than 1 QPS.

Why else would they benchmark to show they can achieve 4,000,000 QPS if all they need is 1 QPS?




While I think the figures might be a little conservative (or might work for the mean, but not the peak) it is a little odd to imagine why an expenses app would need a database that syncronises via a private blockchain to track expenses. It would be interesting to understand the rationale.


Sunk cost fallacy?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: