What does it mean to "freeze Tornado Cash addresses"?
I can't make anything of this sentence. Wouldn't miners be the only ones to "freeze" assets on an Ethereum address, and only if 51% of them collude to not accept blocks in which funds from those addresses are moved?
Not all ERC20 tokens are created equal, it simply means that the token implemented the ERC20 interface, it has a transfer() function as per the ERC20 spec, but that transfer() can check if an address is blacklisted. For example, take the WETH
(I am providing a different answer, not building on the prior one.) Tether is a centralized financial service which mints USDT in exchange for USD and lets you redeem USDT later for USD (using fiat bank wire transfers in and out, taking a small but non-negligible cut in both directions, and so $0.9987 or somewhere around there is the true power bound target of the currency, not $1.00). Honestly, I am not sure how their service is legal in the US under merely FinCEN regulations (the ones that prevent you from selling large prepaid gift cards and redeeming them for cash), OFAC aside...
I can't make anything of this sentence. Wouldn't miners be the only ones to "freeze" assets on an Ethereum address, and only if 51% of them collude to not accept blocks in which funds from those addresses are moved?