> Stating that white heterosexual men are at the intersection of privilege is quite different from "mandatorily demonizing white men in everything they publish." That is quite the chip on your shoulder, I think.
It's very much a racist statement in my book. Of course, that's the core of the intersectional ideology, a racist ideology. The first and most important divider when it comes to classes is wealth. Identity politics as practiced by intersectionalists served the elite well.
If one pushes that obnoxious and absurd intersectional logic to its paroxysm, then one can deem people from jewish origin "at the intersection of privilege". Sounds antisemitic? Indeed, because that whole ideology is indeed racist at its core, under pretense of "social justice".
It's very much a racist statement in my book. Of course, that's the core of the intersectional ideology, a racist ideology. The first and most important divider when it comes to classes is wealth. Identity politics as practiced by intersectionalists served the elite well.
If one pushes that obnoxious and absurd intersectional logic to its paroxysm, then one can deem people from jewish origin "at the intersection of privilege". Sounds antisemitic? Indeed, because that whole ideology is indeed racist at its core, under pretense of "social justice".