> I feel the performance must be more than 100x slower than before!
Not too far off. This paper [0] compared 27 languages for speed and energy efficiency (which is very interesting).
Python was 72 times slower than C and consumed 76 times more energy.
I think Python is a very useful language at many levels. Great for prototyping stuff. No doubt about that. If performance and energy efficiency are important, it seems obvious one has to look elsewhere.
Not too far off. This paper [0] compared 27 languages for speed and energy efficiency (which is very interesting).
Python was 72 times slower than C and consumed 76 times more energy.
I think Python is a very useful language at many levels. Great for prototyping stuff. No doubt about that. If performance and energy efficiency are important, it seems obvious one has to look elsewhere.
[0] https://haslab.github.io/SAFER/scp21.pdf