Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Are you referring to Synder v Phelps where the Supreme Court held that a distant (1000 ft away) protest didn't qualify for monetary (tort) damages for the deceased's family?

Because that case doesn't strike down the state laws preventing protests in close proximity. It just ruled that the private citizen can't get lots of money for emotional distress caused by a protest.



It barred IIED claims specifically because they were targeted at activities protected by the 1st amendment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: