Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sadly in the US there is not really a privacy debate. Essentially the “I have nothing to hide” line of reasoning has been pressed ahead and the nation continues in the direction of China.

We have a bit of a pretend debate from now and then … and a few technical elite are able to protect their own privacy to some degree… but for the masses privacy debate was over before it began. If anything it is just a marketing campaign by a few companies like Apple.

(Side Note: Apple fully complies with all warrants and decrypts all icloud data and hands it over)



> Apple fully complies with all warrants and decrypts all icloud data and hands it over

nooo, the same Apple that had "never heard of the NSA". it can't be...


> Apple fully complies with all warrants and decrypts all icloud data and hands it over

You say this like it's some kind of gotcha, rather than Apple, a major corporation, refusing to actively break the law of the country where they're headquartered.


> refusing to actively break the law of the country where they're headquartered.

it is not illegal to allow users to hold their own keys such that Apple would have nothing to hand over to the government

Apple chooses to run icloud in such a way that they can provide data on request.


Apple chooses to run iCloud in basically the same way every mainstream cloud company does, plus some additional privacy features.

Expecting them to operate a service like iCloud like a tech-expert-focused privacy-first-even-before-usability service is just utterly unrealistic.


Sloppy excuse. Breaking the law seems to be no problem for any form of security service. The case of privacy has long been an issue outside of the law.

Of course I don't expect companies to break the law, it is to no benefit to them, but we should not pretend that the rule of law has much value when it comes to government surveillance. And I would argue that to protect your privacy the legality of the means are secondary.


Taking every legal means to resist a warrant is your right, not actively breaking the law.

At the very least, it's obviously passively breaking the law, unless you consider refusing to obey an activity.


The same Apple that had gotten into a feud with the FBI over refusing to sign software for unlocking a mass-shooter's phone?


Well...yes, the same Apple.

Because there's a world of difference between responding to a lawful warrant to produce data you have stored on your servers, and agreeing to create a special version of your software specifically to give the FBI carte blanche to unlock any phones they want (at least within that particular model).


The special version of the software was also 'compelled' via a legal order: https://epic.org/documents/apple-v-fbi-2/

By contesting it they were going against a court order, not just refusing an informal request by the FBI.


Apple doesn’t and can’t “decrypt” data that it says it doesn’t have the encryption keys for like your health information. Apple lists the data that isn’t encrypted and the data that is




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: