Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> I think most folks here are drastically underestimating the complexity involved in getting a train control system right

The phrase "butt-puckering" comes to mind. Ya some whizkid could come along and put something together but they'd be foolish to attempt, there is 1000 atm of pressure to not get one damn thing wrong. All the things currently wrong with the system are grandfathered. One single wrong thing in your new system and you are toasted.




Sure there are safety considerations (and plenty of dramatic safety events from BART), but I'd venture to guess even there it's rarely quite so black and white.

I was actually thinking more of day-to-day nuisance problems than anything else. Things like getting stuck at the station while the train's computer gizmos reboot, stop annunciators getting confused (or out of sync with each other), having to position the train manually within a station. Or even software failures as hardware wears out – shit like that almost always fails in a safe manner. Unfortunately even a safe failure can have massive consequences which raises the cost of failing fast and breaking thing often.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: