The flow of Jobs' voice is a little off, but wow this is incredible. But also incredibly concerning. Its cool tech, and I guess nothing can stop the inevitability of new technology, but the ability to replicate people's voice, speech patterns, and how they look to a pretty accurate degree is mega sketchy. I guess to future proof yourself, just minimize your audio and visual data online...
The impression I got is that his tone sounded like someone giving a speech or presentation. Rogan sounded more natural.
I suspect a large part of the training data was Jobs giving presentations in front of an audience so his AI voice sounds like public speaking. Whereas Rogan's data would be most likely be conversations from his podcast so his AI voice sounds more conversational.
Or, you know, if you want to be "resurrected" after the singularity from your digital web-crumbs then make sure you leave plenty of them. People who left the best data will be first to be uploaded.
