> First, stop saying "the opposite of science" that doesn't make sense.

I only said it once, and it makes perfect sense - thinking that if something doesn't work on humans it doesn't work at all is primitive and superstitious - it's literally the opposite of science, where things are tested on animals before humans.

> Why test for this on dogs first?

> It's a mental capability so communication is important. Why not test on a human first?

I agree with this, but your original assertion, to whit:

>>> Wouldn't you first want to prove that psychic abilities exist at all and if you planned to do that use humans.

is wrong. None of your replies make it any more right.