Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Wikipedia (a feature-rich site) is operated by 500 people.

Twitter, with roughly the same measly feature set it had 15 years ago, is operated by 7500 people.

Maybe some "brain drain" would not be a bad thing?



They aren't comparable in any meaningful way. They have quite different classes of problems, not to mention the scale of Twitter completely dwarfs that of Wikipedia.


>the scale of Twitter completely dwarfs that of Wikipedia

In what terms? Can you share some numbers maybe?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: