I dont think its unreasonable to expect them to hold to a minimum ethical standard.
Taking money for an obvious scam, that obviously misrepresents the person in the advert... not to mention the obviously fake accounts pretending to be that person.
What if someone disagrees with that and wants to include potential or alleged misinformation? Should it be censored because it is your wish to do so? I would heavily dislike that approach and would not like to accommodate your wishes. We could just use different platforms and be fine with that. Maybe you could use a platform provided by government? Revival of the old times perhaps?
Let me ask you this slightly offtopic since this is new information. Marjorie Taylor Greene tweeted that the person who attacked Paul Pelosi was friends with him and defended Elon Musk who tweeted a link to a news website that is saying it was gay love triangle.
Does this not bother you? Do you think this is a problem in anyway? That more people might be hurt? If so what is the solution?
Taking money for an obvious scam, that obviously misrepresents the person in the advert... not to mention the obviously fake accounts pretending to be that person.
Do you really think this situation is "ok" ?