Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I will take my anecdote over this data. I am undoubtedly much safer surrounded by moral gun carriers, than when I am around only unarmed people.

My state doesn't even require permits to do so. Can't recall the last mass shooting that happened in this state.

My boss is chill with me carrying at work. A couple coworkers know that I carry at work. The police are chill when I'm pulled over, and I announce that I am carrying.

There's a culture issue. Guns aren't leaving. Banning them leaves us more vulnerable. Citizens commonly carried firearms around the world until the rise of fascism. Now the norm is disarming the populous. I'm more scared of my government knowing that the citizenry they govern have no means of retaliation, than I am of the very very miniscule chance that I'll have to stop a mass shooter.



Ok keep ignoring data and reality and saying "how does this happen?" every time another mass shooting happens.


We agree there's a problem. We disagree on what the problem is, and how to fix it. You're not gonna fix anything.


Quite a few other countries have solved the gun violence problem via gun control. The US could too.

It's pretty logical that less guns = less gun violence.

You will never be allowed to have weaponry that can seriously challenge the US military in any meaningful way, that govt resistance part is a pipe dream.


That was the whole point of the 2A.

The government being too powerful doesn't mean "well it's over, let's just make them more powerful."

Y'all take an existing problem and jump in the totally wrong direction with solutions.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: