Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I mean, given the cost of litigation, and the inability to get counter-judgement (IE attorneys fees), this is already enough "reason".

These are litigation funding exercises, so the goal is protection of the "investors".

But you'd also get things like protection against discovery (the smaller entity has nothing to give you), etc.

This is the sort of thing where they go too far, and end up in jail despite thinking they're just good at playing the system. (see, e.g., prenda law)




Prenda is exactly what this brought to mind for me too. Maybe popehat will do a deep dive on this stuff.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: