DNA can express with both genders organs in the same being. While they are rare, such organisms are still people, and their identity is certainly worthy of some consideration. We can argue about thresholds and terminology. But I don't think it's asking too much to address an individual in the way they prefer.
> DNA can express with both genders organs in the same being.
Again, those are edge cases of the category, which does not mean the category does not exist.
> But I don't think it's asking too much to address an individual in the way they prefer.
That is only a part of what is being asked. The real ask is to actually believe in this whole theory of self-identification, and if ANY objections are raised it's punished with shame.
