Not everything is black or white. It’s not the case that there are either good guys or crooks. Often fraud is committed by people that start off doing well or have good intentions but screw up or the market goes against them. They then borrow (steal) just for a short while to make things right and make the same mistakes and commit more fraud.

I think a lot of people haven’t decided when SBF became the crook and what his intentions were. As we don’t have all the information and he hasn’t gone to court, isn’t that healthy?