The data being insufficient because it focuses on white men only, because that's where we have the earliest data, which is "colonial" and "white supremacist". Who's the mob again?
This isn’t about anyone’s hurt feelings. This is about an ideologically motivated author wading into a subject in which they have no obvious domain expertise and then making irrelevant assertions that the original research is “colonial” or “racist.”
It is completely reasonable for people to point out that your linked rebuttal to the original topic is garbage. I think you’re the one with the hurt feelings.
