Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've heard on a few podcasts that this is how European countries do this. We need to stop letting for-profit companies gamble with the health and longevity of the species in the interest of profits.


You are right that this is a much better approach. The problem is Europe also has low sperm counts and are also being exposed to endocrine disruptors in the same way as the rest of the world. So whatever whitelist approach they are using does not seem to be saving them from this problem.


There's not a huge difference between what's legal to sell in Europe and the US.


There's however a huge difference in what's being actually prescribed and what's not. Anti-Depressants and strong pain medication isn't as easy to get as in the us as in Germany.


> We need to stop letting for-profit companies gamble with the health and longevity of the species in the interest of profits.

We might want to prevent them from owning our candidates, legislators and judges first.


The species that mutilates and heats the planet, and which created those companies?

This may be a long-overdue self-correction.

Global infertility may just be what solves global warming.


You're welcome to properly end your own fertility at any time. I quite like humans.


I can prove that you don't quite like humans.

How many destitute families are you sheltering in your home?

The world is polluted, and heating up. The most obvious parameter of that is this: the sheer number of people.

You can like people and be on board with the idea that there is such a thing as too many people in one place at one time. The extreme example of that is crowding incidents in which people die, like the one in Seoul this Halloween. No, it's not always "the more, the merrier".

Buildings, vehicles, and various structures and equipment which support or carry people all have maximum occupancies.

Maybe, so do planets?


> How many destitute families are you sheltering in your home?

This is the worst argument ever. I'm not sure what kind of fallacy it is, but it's a really really bad argument.

It's even worse than the "if you really wanted to lose weight you'd find a way, so obviously you just don't care that you are overweight" argument.


Not proposing, recommending, or implying a personal view either way, but for interest and in relation to the topic: https://www.vhemt.org/


Yep, this is the fundamental difference between EU and US laws for consumables.

In the EU the manufacturer needs to prove the ingredients are safe.

In the US they need to prove they're not harmful. "not harmful" != "safe"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: