> Nobody is saying the FTX saga will be concluded in 1-2 years
As per the original comment:
> how SBF won't go to jail because of American corruption--I'll see you back here in a year or two.
Going to jail implies he will be found guilty and it will be concluded. If SBF is only indicted, he is still innocent until proven guilty.
> That's an apples to oranges comparison.
Would like to know more about this. I am not saying he won’t go to jail, but why would prosecutors be faster in indicting SBF?
Lastly, I am caught off guard by how emotional you seem about wanting to demonstrate how efficient the US legal system is. I am not saying it isn’t, but 1-2 years to conclude (again per original comment) seems quick for any legal system.
You should include the next sentence in the quote. "Then we can have that conversation." I also think two years from now would be a better time to have the conversation about whether we believe SBF will go to jail. The trial certainly may take longer than that, but we'll have a better sense of which way the wind is blowing.
Agree. For the record, I do think he is going to jail. The facts are probably there, I think the part that will be challenging is proving intent. Did he intentionally funnel money to his trading firm. Once they build a strong enough case, they will go after him.
As per the original comment:
> how SBF won't go to jail because of American corruption--I'll see you back here in a year or two.
Going to jail implies he will be found guilty and it will be concluded. If SBF is only indicted, he is still innocent until proven guilty.
> That's an apples to oranges comparison.
Would like to know more about this. I am not saying he won’t go to jail, but why would prosecutors be faster in indicting SBF?
Lastly, I am caught off guard by how emotional you seem about wanting to demonstrate how efficient the US legal system is. I am not saying it isn’t, but 1-2 years to conclude (again per original comment) seems quick for any legal system.