Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is critically wrong, and misses the point of the cliché entirely.

Absence of evidence, in your case via a clean building inspection, does not mean the building is safe. It just means the checklist of known items was considered and nothing bad found.

Ask a building inspector if their clean report proves nothing is wrong with the building.

They will be firm and quick to inform you that it’s not a warranty — anything not checked was not covered. Items not covered could still be significant problems.

That’s the whole point of the saying. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.



I believe you have conflated "proving a negative" with "evidence of absence".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: