I said nowhere in that article method polymorphism is implemented.
Well, not quite. You said that it isn't OOP without method polymorphism. So no need to fly off the handle and accuse others of misreading something you didn't write.
> Well, not quite. You said that it isn't OOP without method polymorphism. So no need to fly off the handle and accuse others of misreading something you didn't write.
I said
> This isn't OO until you implement some form of method polymorphism.
which means the article didn't implement method polymorphism.
> So no need to fly off the handle and accuse others of misreading something you didn't write.
So you need to pay attention at first place instead of "flying off the handle" yourself and then accusing others to do so in a useless comment.
Well, not quite. You said that it isn't OOP without method polymorphism. So no need to fly off the handle and accuse others of misreading something you didn't write.