Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The pedants among us might prefer: "novel among mainstream programming languages of the 21st century which predated Go".


Pity that even Limbo from 20th century was more feature rich than Go.


Pity that people still argue as though "feature rich" is some unmitigated good. :)


If it wasn't, Go wouldn't have gotten newer features.


Obviously this isn't true, it only indicates that Go didn't pick exactly the right set of features at inception (and of course, no one claimed it did).


Or the juice was worth the squeeze?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: