> I am not saying you should not hold them accountable
You did imply exactly that.
> Do we make them pay a huge fine and climate change is averted? This seems pure distraction to me.
If holding them accountable is a distraction, that implies we shouldn't be doing it.
So yeah, you did kind of say it.
I don't really care about fines. I think the people in charge at that time should be investigated, their internal communication, coordination, and fraud should be exposed, and then they should be put in jail for fraud, if they're still alive. You call this a distraction. I call it making a point.
You did imply exactly that.
> Do we make them pay a huge fine and climate change is averted? This seems pure distraction to me.
If holding them accountable is a distraction, that implies we shouldn't be doing it.
So yeah, you did kind of say it.
I don't really care about fines. I think the people in charge at that time should be investigated, their internal communication, coordination, and fraud should be exposed, and then they should be put in jail for fraud, if they're still alive. You call this a distraction. I call it making a point.